26 Aug
2014
26 Aug
'14
9:33 p.m.
On Aug 26, 2014, at 3:22 PM, Robert P. Goldman rpgoldman@sift.info wrote:
Ben Hyde wrote:
Would changing (:tree <path>) so it accepts an optional argument be less adhoc?
Possibly (:tree <path> &key (depth nil) (don-not-recure-after-asdf-encountered nil))
That said this would have little if any value in my use case. I point ask it to sweep over my the directory where all my coding lives, and most of the directories in there are not lisp, and so there ain’t any asd files in those.
I think the problem with this is that, as Fare points out, it's the author of the system who has laid out the directory tree
your both quite wise, i agree