I"ve generated another report where CFFI-TOOLCHAIN errors are filtered out: https://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-53.html
What do you think of the remaining errors?
26.12.2016, 02:28, "Faré" fahree@gmail.com:
This is a bug I introduced in cffi-toolchain, where the conditional asdf-compat file breaks the chain of :serial t when it is not defined because the implementation already has a recent enough asdf.
I sent a pull request for CFFI: https://github.com/cffi/cffi/pull/111
Please use that, too :-(
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule. — H. L. Mencken
On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Anton Vodonosov avodonosov@yandex.ru wrote:
25.12.2016, 21:34, "Faré" fahree@gmail.com:
What I meant is that SBCL 1.1.10 is over three years old. Should we really be supporting anything older than two or three years?
I personally don't know - my job is to report.
The "no package with name "CFFI-TOOLCHAIN" error hapens on ECL 16.1.2. - quite new one. CC Daniel Kochmanski.
I've reprinted the report with lisp name on every row in case too many rows fall under the same value of lisp implementation, to make it easier to see what lisp was used: file:///home/anton/my/prj/cl-test-grid/cl-test-grid2/reports-generated/asdf/asdf-diff-52.html