On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Faré <fahree@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5 February 2011 11:13, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
<juanjose.garciaripoll@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Faré <fahree@gmail.com> wrote:
> Fare, could you please go back to the other method I posted. This one doesDo you need to change it dynamically? Why not just have a static #+ecl
> not allow one to *CHANGE* the way COMPILE-FILE* behaves.
>
or something? don't understand the use case.
Since all this is ECL-specific (so far), I suppose you could use
ADVISE, or whatever ECL-specific hooking mechanism exists, or
delete-method calls.