21.02.2013, 23:50, "Anton Vodonosov" avodonosov@yandex.ru:
Sorry, not the previous link, here is the correct one: http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-15.html
The table is updated with CCL results.
Here is the filtered table, showing only warning-caused failures we haven't see before, until the compilation was fixed by utf8: http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-15-utf-only.html
Here are those new failures sorted by dependencies [1]: http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/sbcl-warning-failures-utf-o... Systems with root blocker count = 0 fail by themselves.
Others fail becuase their dependencies fail, so we don't know whether they have their own problems - they didn't have chance to compile.
1 - The dependency information is retrieved form quicklisp 2013-01-28; as we know, it's not possible to retrieve dependency information 100% precise, because .asd files can contain arbitrary code, like explicit calls to (asdf:operate). But for this diiscusssion and that small number of system I think we can count this dependency information as precise.