hmmm...
On 2010-02-26, at 17:42 , Robert Goldman wrote:
On 2/26/10 Feb 26 -10:17 AM, james anderson wrote:
good evening;
as an aside, in light of these changes.
? is there some reason that they are not coded to expand at compile time into a second phase of operations in terms of strings. that two-phase method gets the symbols out of the image earlier as they're not needed in fasls. as a side-effect, #: idiom would not be necessary.
I suspect that this may be necessary in order to make this work on ACL in "modern," case-sensitive mode. Using the symbol-name of an uninterned symbol is usually the way I code for portability across mlisp and other lisps.
Note that you can't reliably just do this at compile-time, since you can toggle the case mode in ACL.
you mean, you actually build with one case mode and load into a lisp which is runnign with another. and the fasl loader adjust the symbol names? i have used "modern" acl's but, yes, that order of pain never occurred to me.
when life gets boring, does one toggle the case-mode of running production systems?