Faré fahree@gmail.com writes:
The cCLan list has apparently become the asdf-devel list.
Is this still where the upstream for split-sequence is? If so, can this patch be applied? If not, who's in charge?
I guess I am, unless someone else wants to be.
diff -rN -u old-split-sequence/build.xcvb new-split-sequence/build.xcvb --- old-split-sequence/build.xcvb 1969-12-31 19:00:00.000000000 -0500 +++ new-split-sequence/build.xcvb 2009-10-22 20:10:35.114171499 -0400 @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +#+xcvb +(module (:fullname "split-sequence"
:depends-on ("split-sequence"):supersedes-asdf ("split-sequence")))
I don't have a problem with this bit. (I don't see why you need a reader conditional, but OK, whatever)
--- old-split-sequence/split-sequence.lisp 2009-10-22 20:10:35.110170150 -0400 +++ new-split-sequence/split-sequence.lisp 2009-10-22 20:10:35.114171499 -0400 @@ -50,6 +50,8 @@ ;;; * (split-sequence #; ";oo;bar;ba;" :start 1 :end 9) ;;; -> ("oo" "bar" "b"), 9
+#+xcvb (module ())
(defpackage "SPLIT-SEQUENCE" (:use "CL") (:nicknames "PARTITION")
This is... no. Please find some way of not infesting code with build-related metainformation.
Best,
Christophe