- Faré snuerr@tznvy.pbz [2013-01-20 22:46:35 -0500]:
Of all the lisp implementations, CLISP has given me the most trouble with ASDF upgrade. Unlike all other Lisps, it won't let me undefine functions and redefine them in the same fasl file. Somehow, I always end up with CLISP either complaining that a function signature doesn't match (was or wasn't a generic function with an incompatible lambda-list), because I couldn't undefine it, or that it is undefined and never redefined, because I undefined it and CLISP throws away my redefinition somehow. I tried to selectively unintern symbols for functions thus upgraded, but that also fails. Yet all these things work in about all other Lisps.
In the end, I punted: I just rename the old ASDF package to ASDF-${version} early on, but that messes with any package that :use's ASDF, and then CLISP will complain again, unless ASDF is the very first thing upgraded before anything uses it.
Could CLISP be made more upgrade-friendly?
When you actually do change function signatures, a warning is, IMO, quite appropriate. I am not really sure why you want to silence them.
(another thing I don't understand that may or may not be related is the .lib output files produced together with a fasl, when and how they are used, and what I should or should not do with them.)
http://clisp.org/impnotes/require.html#lib-files