9 Jan
2016
9 Jan
'16
5:43 p.m.
On 1/9/16 Jan 9 -3:13 AM, Raymond Toy wrote:
"Robert" == Robert Goldman rpgoldman@sift.net writes:
Robert> On 1/7/16 Jan 7 -10:44 PM, Raymond Toy wrote: >>>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Goldman >>>>>>> <rpgoldman@sift.net> writes: >> Robert> On 1/4/16 Jan 4 -11:48 AM, Raymond Toy wrote: OK, I just Robert> pushed 3.1.6.8 with the fix for you. >> >> Hmm. I just did a git pull --rebase, but only 3.1.6.6 is >> available. >> >> Am I doing something wrong? Robert> I think so. I just did a git pull (not rebase), and I now Robert> have Faré's Robert> 3.1.6.9 on top of my 3.1.6.8.Ok, AFAICT, I do have the code (from gitlab), and I can see the commit where you bumped to version to 3.1.6.8, but there's no tag for 3.1.6.8. There's one for 3.1.6.7 and 3.1.6.9 but not .8.
I'll use 3.1.6.9 for the next cmucl snapshot.
Sorry; forgot the
"git push origin 3.1.6.8" that's needed as part of bumping the revision.
So the code went, but not the tag.
It seems wrong to have random tags as the versions used in implementations. Wonder if I should run the full set of tests to bless this as 3.1.7. Is there enough time for that? There have been a reasonable number of bug fixes.
Best, r