On 5/25/10 May 25 -11:11 AM, Faré wrote:
I'm not sure what you want, but try "" for current directory, ".." for up, etc. ".." is actually not recognized by ASDF but passed to the implementation, and from it to the OS.
I added a test that verifies that "" works as a pathname component. I wasn't sure that it would work for ACL, and wanted to verify for my satisfaction.
I'd like to push the new test (no change to asdf.lisp). Is that OK with you?
thanks, r
Paths are relative to the parent's pathname's directory.
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] Theists think all gods but theirs are false. Atheists simply don't make an exception for the last one.
On 25 May 2010 11:24, Robert Goldman rpgoldman@sift.info wrote:
What's the right syntax for specifying a relative pathname for a module whose files should live in the parent directory instead of in a subdirectory?
E.g., if I have
(:module foo :components ((:file "bar") (:file "baz")) :pathname ???? )
what goes in there if I do NOT want the files to live in foo/, but with all the other files?
I could put a FAQ about this in the manual...
best, r