On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Faré
<fahree@gmail.com> wrote:
Juanjo, can you test whether this satisfies you?
Yes, sorry, I did not answer before: I am away from home and took some time to get the changes. It all seems correct to me.
Regarding ECL, do fasls have a different extension when using the
bytecode compiler than when using the normal compiler? I hope so and
suppose so. Otherwise there will be an "interesting" issue of having
to reset asdf:implementation-string when switching compiler.
Different compilers produce different file extensions.
Thanks a lot for your support, and sorry for the delay!