Neat! Thanks for posting the pointer!  BTW, you might want to change the name from :properties to something like :doc-properties to avoid potential name collisions...

-- 
Robert P. Goldman

On March 20, 2021 at 09:11:45, Marco Antoniotti (marco.antoniotti@unimib.it) wrote:

Cool, thanks!

Turns out that just using :properties in the system definition works.


Cheers

Marco




On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 2:41 PM Robert P. Goldman <rpgoldman@sift.net> wrote:
Yes, if you look at FIVEAM-ASDF, that is how John Maraist and I do it. We introduce a subclass of systems that has an extra slot holding the list of tests to be performed, and PERFORM reads that slot when doing TEST-OP.

-- 
Robert P. Goldman

On March 20, 2021 at 02:45:57, Marco Antoniotti (marco.antoniotti@unimib.it) wrote:

Ok.

Well, can you at least have a plist or something in the component specification?  I presume yes.  I am just allergic to RTFM as you know :)

Marco

On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 12:04 AM Robert Goldman <rpgoldman@sift.info> wrote:

We don't actually. Faré deprecated that. The reasons are complicated, but basically, it wasn't possible to propagate arguments through a plan. What do you need an argument for? Maybe there's a work-around.

On 19 Mar 2021, at 16:24, Marco Antoniotti wrote:

BTW.

If you do not advise to specialize OPERATE, how do you pass arguments to PERFORM?

MA

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:45 PM Robert Goldman <rpgoldman@sift.info> wrote:

P.S. I don't recommend writing your own OPERATE methods -- OPERATE is quite complicated and messing with it could lead you into very deep water. I don't believe you should ever need to.

On 19 Mar 2021, at 13:42, Robert Goldman wrote:

Hi. I'm happy to help you work through this, but so that it doesn't recur as a problem, I'd appreciate it if you would help me fix the manual's discussion of this.

First, have you read this page https://common-lisp.net/project/asdf/asdf.html#Creating-new-operations ?

Please have a look at that -- it's not very long -- and let us know what more needs to be supplied.

I note the discussion of operation-done-p. I suspect that is your problem -- your new operation is not aware that it needs to be performed.

This page is substantially redundant with the pages on the object model, and should be beefed up with cross-references, and more inclusion of docstrings...

On 19 Mar 2021, at 12:58, Marco Antoniotti wrote:

Hi

I am trying to create a new ASDF:OPERATION, but I must be missing something and the manual (or Google) does not seem to help much.

How do you create a new operation, which may be quite simple?  Or better, how do you get PERFORM and/or OPERATE to actually do something for you.

I know I should RTFM, but in this case it is more of a RTFC, which is far more difficult.

I tried the following

(defclass my-op (non-propagating-operation) ())

(defmethod perform ((o my-op) (s system))
   (print 42))

(defmethod operate ((o my-op) (s system) &key &allow-other-keys)
   (print 666))

But then, doing

cl-user 42> (operate 'my-op (find-system "somesys") :bar 1024)
#<MY-OP >
#<ASDF/PLAN:SEQUENTIAL-PLAN 2301B97B>

is all I get.

Any tutorial or advice?

Thanks

--
Marco Antoniotti, Associate Professor         tel. +39 - 02 64 48 79 01
DISCo, Università Milano Bicocca U14 2043 http://dcb.disco.unimib.it
Viale Sarca 336
I-20126 Milan (MI) ITALY


--
Marco Antoniotti, Associate Professor         tel. +39 - 02 64 48 79 01
DISCo, Università Milano Bicocca U14 2043 http://dcb.disco.unimib.it
Viale Sarca 336
I-20126 Milan (MI) ITALY


--
Marco Antoniotti, Associate Professor         tel. +39 - 02 64 48 79 01
DISCo, Università Milano Bicocca U14 2043 http://dcb.disco.unimib.it
Viale Sarca 336
I-20126 Milan (MI) ITALY


--
Marco Antoniotti, Associate Professor         tel. +39 - 02 64 48 79 01
DISCo, Università Milano Bicocca U14 2043 http://dcb.disco.unimib.it
Viale Sarca 336
I-20126 Milan (MI) ITALY