16 Jan
2013
16 Jan
'13
3:59 p.m.
Faré fahree@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Zach Beane xach@xach.com wrote:
Faré fahree@gmail.com writes:
Sure. Which format do you prefer? If I remember correctly, you will want a directory asdf-driver-2.26.100/ containing the code.
Either format is fine. Sometimes a tarball implies a level of release engineering.
That begs the question: how should asdf be distributed?
Does it? I thought we were talking about asdf-driver.
As asdf.lisp only?
Yes. As it always has been.
Zach