version-satisfies
is already a generic function. We will add some more capabilities to the built-in version in ASDF 3.4, but library authors will continue to be able to implement their own extensions.
On 17 Nov 2021, at 11:24, Didier Verna wrote:
Stelian Ionescu wrote:
Mostly sounds good to me. Assuming you're still interested in more
expressive version numbers and constraints for 3.4, I'll work on moving
that off the back burner.Adding fine-grained version constraints would be a big mistake.
I do not have the time to check this thoroughly right now, but I
recall having suggested that ASDF shouldn't impose any constraints on
version "numbers", but rather defer version comparison to libraries
when they use a version numbering scheme that ASDF doesn't understand.
This can be done by providing generic functions like version-> etc.,
and letting people provide methods on them.There may even be an issue and a patch lurking around somewhere.
Again, sorry for being fuzzy, this is just from the top of my head.--
Resistance is futile. You will be jazzimilated.Lisp, Jazz, Aïkido: http://www.didierverna.info