19 Nov
2015
19 Nov
'15
5:17 a.m.
On 11/18/15 Nov 18 -8:35 PM, Faré wrote:
Yeah, there's an awkward merge or rebase happening when "stable" jumps from 3.1 to 3.2, whereas no such jump happens if old branches have numbered names and are forked off a master that keeps going forward.
Surely git must have a solution to this problem? There must be a ton of projects that need to have a "stable" and a "development" branch. So this must arise all over the place....
Anyone know?