On 11/18/21 3:45 AM, Marco Antoniotti wrote:
> Sorry but I am missing something.
>
> It was said in this thread (don't remember who, apologies) that
>
> YYYYMMDD
>
> would work.  Will it?

Yes. YYYYMMDD is currently a valid version string (assuming it's all
digits). Whatever we choose will allow a superset of what's already allowed.

-Eric