![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/da8638bce265a9edbab91dd837042d03.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
The problem is that the asdf framework does not lend itself to returning things from ops (particularly if you need to roll up subsidiary results from sub-operations). ___ Robert P. Goldman Principal Scientist, SIFT, LLC www.sift.info ..... Original Message ....... On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 12:18:50 +0200 "Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll" <juanjose.garciaripoll@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Tobias C. Rittweiler <tcr@freebits.de> wrote:
To me, the most interesting advantage that I see in ASDF providing a test operation, is that it should allow for automatic testing of arbitrary software packages.
Indeed! See http://ecls.sourceforge.net/logs_lib.html
I do not see how providing a stream argument is relevant to that. Or do you propose that people should /parse/ a test framework's output?
Please, please do not force that upon us. It would be so EASY to ask each tester to just return a sequence or number with the tests that failed!
Juanjo
-- Instituto de FĂsica Fundamental, CSIC c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
_______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel