Re: [asdf-devel] Suggested patches for ASDF

-- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. "Faré" fahree@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 18:53, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll juanjose.garciaripoll@googlemail.com wrote: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 12:41 AM, Faré fahree@gmail.com wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 18:33, Robert Goldman rpgoldman@sift.info wrote: >> > Question: any objection to modifying your patch so that we have >> > something like: >> > >> > #+ecl >> > (defun use-ecl-byte-compiler-p () >> > (member :ecl-bytecomp *features*)) >> > #-ecl >> > (defun use-ecl-byte-compiler-p () >> > nil) >> > >> > and then call the function in place of the member query in other code? >> > >> No. Juanjo will confirm, but >> IIUC it can change at runtime after having loaded ASDF, so it's > > Yes, the change may happen after ASDF is loaded, without problems. > >> >> #+ecl >> (defun use-ecl-bytecode-compiler-p () >> (member :ecl-bytecmp *features*)) > > Isn't this the same as the code above? > If by "the code above" you mean your original patch and my merge thereof, then yes it is the same, with just a tiny bit of refactoring. If by "the code above" you mean Robert's version with #+ecl, then no, it's different, since Robert's version resolves the features at read-time; by the time the features are updated, it's then too late for ASDF to change its mind. —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org