On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, Robert Goldman wrote:
On 4/20/12 Apr 20 -6:43 PM, Daniel Herring wrote:
ASDF does not need to support arbitrary encodings in system definition files. UTF-8 is the simplest and most portable solution for non-ASCII characters in system definitions.
This seems mostly true. The only exception I can really think of is for metadata. What if the author's name uses non UTF-8?
What character in the author's name cannot be encoded in UTF-8?
Yes, there are some hieroglyphs and other ancient character sets not in UTF-8. Are there any gaps in coverage for current languages that have other character sets?
This will be an inconvenience for those who usually use a different local-specific encoding, and I think it is less than the inconvenience to the whole community if we try to support other encodings in the definition files.
- Daniel