P.S. SBCL doesn't like the way asdf is compiled these days.
- (load "asdf.lisp")
... ; in: LAMBDA NIL ; (ASDF-UTILITIES:TRUENAMIZE ASDF::PATH) ; ; caught STYLE-WARNING: ; undefined function: TRUENAMIZE ; ; compilation unit finished ; Undefined function: ; TRUENAMIZE ; caught 1 STYLE-WARNING condition
; (ASDF::FORMAT-ARGUMENTS ASDF::C) ; ; caught STYLE-WARNING: ; undefined function: FORMAT-ARGUMENTS
; (ASDF::FORMAT-CONTROL ASDF::C) ; ; caught STYLE-WARNING: ; undefined function: FORMAT-CONTROL ... and many more
SBCL doesn't like forward function definitions. There always were such functions. There might be a few more now. If you think that matters, we could add declaim ftype declarations.
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] I don't program enough to be called a "programmer", and I don't non-program enough to be called a "non-programmer". So I'm a non-non-programmer, which, in intuitionistic logic, is weaker than a programmer. — Faré