Re: Fwd: Re: Is the :PERFORM stanza still valid?

On 12/8/16 Dec 8 -2:40 PM, Faré wrote:

./make-asdf.sh extract "2.26 2.27 3.0.1 3.1.2" grep 'def.*make-operation' build/asdf-version*.lisp

It was defined in asdf 2.27, i.e. the first asdf 3 pre-release.

Thanks!

So no one has to worry about backwards-compatibility -- any ASDF in the wild will have MAKE-OPERATION in it.

Best, r

-#f

On Dec 8, 2016 13:54, "Robert Goldman" <rpgoldman@sift.net mailto:rpgoldman@sift.net> wrote:

Fare --

Is there an easy way to find out when ASDF:MAKE-OPERATION was added to
the API, so that people can provide backward-compatibility?

I suppose it might make sense to do some kind of backward search over
the released versions, and for each one, extract a list of exported
symbols from ASDF and UIOP.

I could probably write a script to do this, but that seems like
something that I am unlikely to get around to.

R


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mark Evenson <evenson@panix.com <mailto:evenson@panix.com>>
To: asdf-devel@common-lisp.net <mailto:asdf-devel@common-lisp.net>
Cc: 
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 19:40:37 +0100
Subject: Re: Is the :PERFORM stanza still valid?


On 2016/12/8 18:28, Robert Goldman wrote:
> Hi, Mark --
>
> The issue is in PROVE-ASDF.  Replacing line 50 of asdf.lisp
>
> (asdf:perform (make-instance 'asdf:load-source-op) c)
>
> with
>
> (asdf:perform (asdf:make-operation 'asdf:load-source-op) c)
>
> should solve the problem.
>
> LMK if that doesn't fix the problem.

Thanks!  That works.

Created an [upstream pull request][34].

[34]: https://github.com/fukamachi/prove/pull/34
<https://github.com/fukamachi/prove/pull/34>

--
"A screaming comes across the sky.  It has happened before, but there
is nothing to compare to it now."