On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Anton Vodonosov avodonosov@yandex.ru wrote:
The tests on 3.1.0.94 have completed.
No regressions detected, here is the report: http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-37.html
The only failure is teepeedee2, which fails because of its own problem
- it includes in its source code libraries like babel, incompatible
with babel from quicklisp.
The lisps tested: abcl-1.2.0-fasl42-linux-x86 abcl-1.2.1-fasl42-linux-x86 ccl-1.9-f96-linux-x86 clisp-2.49-unix-x86 cmu-snapshot-2014-01__20e_unicode_-linux-x86 ecl-13.5.1-unknown-linux-i686-bytecode ecl-13.5.1-unknown-linux-i686-lisp-to-c sbcl-1.1.11-linux-x86
I am now preparing to test the patch. Fare, you say on the lates SBCL, therefore I have build sbcl-1.1.16. Will test on it.
Thanks a lot! The quality of ASDF releases just wouldn't be the same without you.
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Demand Truly Free Health Care: where doctors need neither pay, food, sleep nor training, and hospitals grow on trees!