Re: [asdf-devel] Q about ASDF on LW

Your backtrace shows nothing obviously wrong, and if extending the stack does the trick, the problem is possibly that LW starts with an extremely small stack and/or does some stack-allocation optimizations that blow the little stack it has. I blame LW settings (did you override the defaults?)

I haven't overridden anything. For some reason I've never understood LW has a small default stack size.

By the way, this is ASDF revision 1.375. LW 5.1 has been fine interpreted with other (earlier) revisions.

- n