30 Mar
2010
30 Mar
'10
4:52 p.m.
On 2010-03-30, at 16:25 , Robert Goldman wrote:
On 3/30/10 Mar 30 -5:00 AM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
[...]
Question: are we going to create a logical pathname translation for just the system sources? Or should we create also something like
CL-PPCRE;FASLS;*.*.*
if asdf decides to befried logical pathnames, it should allow the system to define its own mapping.
in addition? This seems a little tricky, since it requires that we hook into the output name rewriting logic, but probably is The Right Thing.
i had understood that the name rewriting logic is disabled for logical pathnames. which is as it should be.