I ran the tests for asdf. Out of 17, 5 fail on sbcl and 7 on clisp. Oops.
On SBCL, the failures seem related to the pathname redirection of ABL / CLC. test1.script test2.script test3.script test-force.script test-static-and-serial.script
On CLISP, the two additional failures are test-module-pathnames.script where clisp reads "foo.cl" as having directory nil instead of (:relative), which I think is legal, and test-retry-loading-component-1.script which seems to have to do with a restart-case retry in do-one-dep, but that's beyond my depth.
The good news is most of these failures are only failures of the test themselves. The bad news is someone probably has to fix them and commit a fix.
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] Intentions are not so much direct descriptions of actual mind processes as Schelling points in the way social animals communicate.
Weird.
On my Mac, it's http://common-lisp.net/project/asdf/test-results.html
SBCL passes all; the others only fail on one.
I'll check it out.
On Oct 22, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Faré wrote:
I ran the tests for asdf. Out of 17, 5 fail on sbcl and 7 on clisp. Oops.
On SBCL, the failures seem related to the pathname redirection of ABL / CLC. test1.script test2.script test3.script test-force.script test-static-and-serial.script
On CLISP, the two additional failures are test-module-pathnames.script where clisp reads "foo.cl" as having directory nil instead of (:relative), which I think is legal, and test-retry-loading-component-1.script which seems to have to do with a restart-case retry in do-one-dep, but that's beyond my depth.
The good news is most of these failures are only failures of the test themselves. The bad news is someone probably has to fix them and commit a fix.
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] Intentions are not so much direct descriptions of actual mind processes as Schelling points in the way social animals communicate.
asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
-- Gary Warren King, metabang.com Cell: (413) 559 8738 Fax: (206) 338-4052 gwkkwg on Skype * garethsan on AIM * gwking on twitter
On the latest SBCL compiled myself w/o CLC, my tests all pass on SBCL. The problem is that the tests expect that there should be no filename redirection, but CLC does it.
The attached patch will disable CLC if present and make the tests pass. It will also solve test-module-pathnames.script for clisp.
test-retry-loading-component-1.script remains broken on my debian's (old?) clisp 2.48, which looks like a bug in that old clisp (it can find the restart, but not invoke it???)
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] Most economic fallacies derive... from the tendency to assume that there is a fixed pie, that one party can gain only at the expense of another. -- Milton Friedman
2009/10/22 Gary King gwking@metabang.com:
Weird.
On my Mac, it's http://common-lisp.net/project/asdf/test-results.html
SBCL passes all; the others only fail on one.
I'll check it out.
On Oct 22, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Faré wrote:
I ran the tests for asdf. Out of 17, 5 fail on sbcl and 7 on clisp. Oops.
On SBCL, the failures seem related to the pathname redirection of ABL / CLC. test1.script test2.script test3.script test-force.script test-static-and-serial.script
On CLISP, the two additional failures are test-module-pathnames.script where clisp reads "foo.cl" as having directory nil instead of (:relative), which I think is legal, and test-retry-loading-component-1.script which seems to have to do with a restart-case retry in do-one-dep, but that's beyond my depth.
The good news is most of these failures are only failures of the test themselves. The bad news is someone probably has to fix them and commit a fix.
Thanks Faré!
On Oct 23, 2009, at 2:19 AM, Faré wrote:
On the latest SBCL compiled myself w/o CLC, my tests all pass on SBCL. The problem is that the tests expect that there should be no filename redirection, but CLC does it.
The attached patch will disable CLC if present and make the tests pass. It will also solve test-module-pathnames.script for clisp.
test-retry-loading-component-1.script remains broken on my debian's (old?) clisp 2.48, which looks like a bug in that old clisp (it can find the restart, but not invoke it???)
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] Most economic fallacies derive... from the tendency to assume that there is a fixed pie, that one party can gain only at the expense of another. -- Milton Friedman
2009/10/22 Gary King gwking@metabang.com:
Weird.
On my Mac, it's http://common-lisp.net/project/asdf/test-results.html
SBCL passes all; the others only fail on one.
I'll check it out.
On Oct 22, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Faré wrote:
I ran the tests for asdf. Out of 17, 5 fail on sbcl and 7 on clisp. Oops.
On SBCL, the failures seem related to the pathname redirection of ABL / CLC. test1.script test2.script test3.script test-force.script test-static-and-serial.script
On CLISP, the two additional failures are test-module-pathnames.script where clisp reads "foo.cl" as having directory nil instead of (:relative), which I think is legal, and test-retry-loading-component-1.script which seems to have to do with a restart-case retry in do-one-dep, but that's beyond my depth.
The good news is most of these failures are only failures of the test themselves. The bad news is someone probably has to fix them and commit a fix.
<asdf.diff>
-- Gary Warren King, metabang.com Cell: (413) 559 8738 Fax: (206) 338-4052 gwkkwg on Skype * garethsan on AIM * gwking on twitter
Patch pushed as ASDF 1.369
On Oct 23, 2009, at 2:19 AM, Faré wrote:
On the latest SBCL compiled myself w/o CLC, my tests all pass on SBCL. The problem is that the tests expect that there should be no filename redirection, but CLC does it.
The attached patch will disable CLC if present and make the tests pass. It will also solve test-module-pathnames.script for clisp.
test-retry-loading-component-1.script remains broken on my debian's (old?) clisp 2.48, which looks like a bug in that old clisp (it can find the restart, but not invoke it???)
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] Most economic fallacies derive... from the tendency to assume that there is a fixed pie, that one party can gain only at the expense of another. -- Milton Friedman
2009/10/22 Gary King gwking@metabang.com:
Weird.
On my Mac, it's http://common-lisp.net/project/asdf/test-results.html
SBCL passes all; the others only fail on one.
I'll check it out.
On Oct 22, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Faré wrote:
I ran the tests for asdf. Out of 17, 5 fail on sbcl and 7 on clisp. Oops.
On SBCL, the failures seem related to the pathname redirection of ABL / CLC. test1.script test2.script test3.script test-force.script test-static-and-serial.script
On CLISP, the two additional failures are test-module-pathnames.script where clisp reads "foo.cl" as having directory nil instead of (:relative), which I think is legal, and test-retry-loading-component-1.script which seems to have to do with a restart-case retry in do-one-dep, but that's beyond my depth.
The good news is most of these failures are only failures of the test themselves. The bad news is someone probably has to fix them and commit a fix.
<asdf.diff>
-- Gary Warren King, metabang.com Cell: (413) 559 8738 Fax: (206) 338-4052 gwkkwg on Skype * garethsan on AIM * gwking on twitter
-
Faré -
Gary King