Dear Anton, can you test the candidate asdf 3.3.0 in the "plan" with cl-test-grid, and compare with 3.1.7 and/or 3.2.1 ? As always, results on a recent sbcl are the more useful ones to get first. (And as usual, there is a dozen of mismaintained systems in quicklisp that still hasn't merged known fixes after several months.) —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org To play a wrong note is insignificant; to play without passion is inexcusable. — misattributed to Beethoven
Will do in the coming days. So far I tested sbcl-1.3.17 with ASDF 3.3.0. (The default ASDF in this SBCL is 3.1.5). Failures when using new ASDF: https://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-66.html 25.07.2017, 02:16, "Faré" <fahree@gmail.com>:
Dear Anton,
can you test the candidate asdf 3.3.0 in the "plan" with cl-test-grid, and compare with 3.1.7 and/or 3.2.1 ? As always, results on a recent sbcl are the more useful ones to get first.
(And as usual, there is a dozen of mismaintained systems in quicklisp that still hasn't merged known fixes after several months.)
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org To play a wrong note is insignificant; to play without passion is inexcusable. — misattributed to Beethoven
Excellent. There are 9 failures. 6 of them are known issues with fixes that the authors haven't merged (mgl-pax and madeira-port, plus a few systems that use them). Two of them work for me and look like your having too small time and/or memory limits: cl-rrt and inner-conditional. The last one, eco, I just can't reproduce at home -- oops, I had a local fix that I had failed to send upstream. Sent. https://github.com/eudoxia0/eco/pull/2 I'd say the plan branch is ready to merged in the master branch, if not the release branch. Before release: tweak packages to solve some upgrade issues, deal with latest ECL merge request. —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Lisp doesn't look any deader than usual to me. — David Thornley On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 6:27 AM, Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov@yandex.ru> wrote:
Will do in the coming days.
So far I tested sbcl-1.3.17 with ASDF 3.3.0. (The default ASDF in this SBCL is 3.1.5).
Failures when using new ASDF: https://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-66.html
25.07.2017, 02:16, "Faré" <fahree@gmail.com>:
Dear Anton,
can you test the candidate asdf 3.3.0 in the "plan" with cl-test-grid, and compare with 3.1.7 and/or 3.2.1 ? As always, results on a recent sbcl are the more useful ones to get first.
(And as usual, there is a dozen of mismaintained systems in quicklisp that still hasn't merged known fixes after several months.)
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org To play a wrong note is insignificant; to play without passion is inexcusable. — misattributed to Beethoven
participants (2)
-
Anton Vodonosov -
Faré