[asdf-devel] (no subject)
Hi. Can anyone point me to a list of which lisps do / don't run ASDF? Or is it believed that all CL implementations work with ASDF? Thanks, - nick
Hi Nick, I think that ASDF may need some loving to work in ECL; otherwise, it should be good. On Sep 16, 2009, at 6:31 AM, Nick Levine wrote:
Hi.
Can anyone point me to a list of which lisps do / don't run ASDF? Or is it believed that all CL implementations work with ASDF?
Thanks,
- nick
_______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
-- Gary Warren King, metabang.com Cell: (413) 559 8738 Fax: (206) 338-4052 gwkkwg on Skype * garethsan on AIM * gwking on twitter
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Gary King <gwking@metabang.com> wrote:
I think that ASDF may need some loving to work in ECL; otherwise, it should be good.
ECL runs its own copy basically because the current ASDF project did not exist at the time -- we just ported SBCL's version. Now, ECL has its own extensions to ASDF, which are needed to build: standalone executables, unified FASLs (merging the different FASLs from the same project), shared and statically linked libraries, etc http://ecls.sourceforge.net/new-manual/ch16.html It would be desirable to replace the core of the ASDF library that we are now using with the project that Gary maintains, and then find a canonical way of writing our extensions, so that they are fool- and future-proof. Juanjo -- Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
Nick Levine writes:
Hi.
Can anyone point me to a list of which lisps do / don't run ASDF? Or is it believed that all CL implementations work with ASDF?
Since a few months, ASDF uses the long form of DEFINE-METHOD-COMBINATION which ABCL does not currently support. They're using an older version for the interim. -T.
participants (4)
-
Gary King -
Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll -
Nick Levine -
Tobias C. Rittweiler