Yes, it looks like the upgrade test is confused by a new case I added or loading uiop on top of an old asdf, then load the asdf fasl; actually, the part that's confused is the test infrastructure itself, that calls use-package, something not quite supported by the hot-upgrade. I've fixed the tests.

—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org The [classical] liberal, of course, does not deny that there are some superior people — he is not an egalitarian — but he denies that anyone has authority to decide who these superior people are. — F. A. Hayek, "Why I Am Not a Conservative"

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Robert Goldman rpgoldman@sift.info wrote:

Ran the tests again today, and got this new error:

Configuring ASDF Being a bit verbose Frob packages TEST ABORTED: Cannot use #<"UIOP/DRIVER" package> from #<"ASDF-TEST" package>, because UIOP/PATHNAME:PATHNAME-DIRECTORY-PATHNAME and PATHNAME-DIRECTORY-PATHNAME will cause a name conflict. Script failed upgrade FAILED for ecl from 2.21 using method 'load-asdf-lisp-and-test-uiop'load-asdf-fasl

This is ECL 12.12.1, Mac OS X Lion.

Best, R

---

asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel