We have merged the bug fixes for 1335323, and pushed as 3.1.2.9. This is a release candidate for 3.1.3, which we hope to release this coming week. Please test it!
thanks! r
I've run cl-test-grid tests on several lisps.
No regressions detected.
The lisps tested: abcl-1.2.1-fasl42-linux-x86 abcl-1.3.1-fasl42-linux-x86 ccl-1.9-f96-linux-x86 clisp-2.49-unix-x86 cmu-snapshot-2014-01__20e_unicode_-linux-x86 cmu-snapshot-2014-05-dirty__20e_unicode_-linux-x86 ecl-13.5.1-unknown-linux-i686-bytecode ecl-13.5.1-unknown-linux-i686-lisp-to-c sbcl-1.1.11-linux-x86 sbcl-1.1.16-linux-x86
The report: http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-44.html (ignore the failures in the right column, they are not caused by ASDF)
Best regards, - Anton
13.07.2014, 07:38, "Robert P. Goldman" rpgoldman@sift.info:
We have merged the bug fixes for 1335323, and pushed as 3.1.2.9. This is a release candidate for 3.1.3, which we hope to release this coming week. Please test it!
thanks! r
Asdf-devel mailing list Asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
On 17 Jul 2014, at 04:43, Anton Vodonosov avodonosov@yandex.ru wrote:
I've run cl-test-grid tests on several lisps.
No regressions detected.
The lisps tested: abcl-1.2.1-fasl42-linux-x86 abcl-1.3.1-fasl42-linux-x86
abcl-1.4.0-dev has been updated to this ASDF.
Mark Evenson wrote:
On 17 Jul 2014, at 04:43, Anton Vodonosov avodonosov@yandex.ru wrote:
I've run cl-test-grid tests on several lisps.
No regressions detected.
The lisps tested: abcl-1.2.1-fasl42-linux-x86 abcl-1.3.1-fasl42-linux-x86
abcl-1.4.0-dev has been updated to this ASDF.
Thanks, Mark. 3.1.2.9 will be blessed as ASDF 3.1.3.
I hope to release 3.1.3 today, but that might slip. Depends on whether I can squeeze it in around RealWork(tm).
cheers, r
-
Anton Vodonosov -
Mark Evenson -
Robert P. Goldman