On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Cyrus Harmon <ch-lisp@bobobeach.com> wrote:

I would suggest asdf:build-system (or renaming load-system, etc… to load, etc…). Let’s be consistent here.

There is already a build-system. One of the points was to make it short, since it's going to be used a lot at the command-line, hence build. Or maybe bs? Or b? Also, since ASDF3, you don't have to build a *system*, for ASDF will do the right thing if you (asdf:operate 'load-op '("some-system" "some-module" "some-file")), the -system is misleading. Maybe having the class name also be a function name would be right? (asdf:load-op 'foo) (asdf:build-op 'bar) —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Plug and Pray!