I am pleased to announce the release of ASDF 2.22. Since previous release 2.21, the changes are as follow:
* require is now mapped to the recently defined require-system, not to load-system anymore.
* more sensible inheritance semantics for default-component-class, which can be either a class or a class name. (hat tip to Nikodemus)
* accept wildcards in directory-files for physical pathnames. (hat tip to Erik Pearson).
These changes are few and subtle, but nonetheless significant to those who'd use these features.
As usual, developers, please test and enjoy, vendors, please update your implementation or distribution.
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Of course, Third World leaders love you. By ascribing third world ills to First World sins, you absolve them of blame for their countries' failure to advance. — John McCarthy
On 6/12/12 12:37 PM, Faré wrote:
I am pleased to announce the release of ASDF 2.22. Since previous release 2.21, the changes are as follow:
Since I didn't see any mention of it, I ran the test with cmucl 2012-06 (the very latest snapshot). All tests pass, so I'll be including asdf 2.22 in the next snapshot.
Ray
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Raymond Toy toy.raymond@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/12/12 12:37 PM, Faré wrote:
I am pleased to announce the release of ASDF 2.22. Since previous release 2.21, the changes are as follow:
Since I didn't see any mention of it, I ran the test with cmucl 2012-06 (the very latest snapshot). All tests pass, so I'll be including asdf 2.22 in the next snapshot.
Oh, excellent.
As usual before release (but unhappily not always - woe to me), I made sure that all our tests pass against all the supported Linux x64 implementations: ccl clisp sbcl ecl cmucl abcl scl allegro lispworks (the complete test suite currently takes almost 2 hours; I haven't tried parallelizing it, though). The CMUCL I used was 2012-04.
I don't remember - did we ever get to the root of the low-level failures we used to have with CMUCL? What was it?
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org As the Chinese say, 1001 words is worth more than a picture. — John McCarthy
On 6/15/12 12:25 PM, Faré wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Raymond Toy toy.raymond@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/12/12 12:37 PM, Faré wrote:
I am pleased to announce the release of ASDF 2.22. Since previous release 2.21, the changes are as follow:
Since I didn't see any mention of it, I ran the test with cmucl 2012-06 (the very latest snapshot). All tests pass, so I'll be including asdf 2.22 in the next snapshot.
Oh, excellent.
As usual before release (but unhappily not always - woe to me), I made sure that all our tests pass against all the supported Linux x64 implementations: ccl clisp sbcl ecl cmucl abcl scl allegro lispworks (the complete test suite currently takes almost 2 hours; I haven't tried parallelizing it, though). The CMUCL I used was 2012-04.
I don't remember - did we ever get to the root of the low-level failures we used to have with CMUCL? What was it?
No, I have not investigated that. Probably something PCL related about upgrading asdf.
Ray
-
Faré -
Raymond Toy