Re: [asdf-devel] new asdf does not like matlisp.asd
traverse returns a plan, which is a list (ordered sequence) of op - component dotted pairs. Effectively, we can execute the plan by mapping PERFORM over it. This is strictly from memory. Hth. "Faré" <fahree@gmail.com> wrote:
Ahem. I admit this is a part of ASDF I am not familiar with.
What does traverse return? Can you trace every exported defgeneric in ASDF and attach to a launchpad bug traces of what happens in either ASDF 1 or ASDF 2?
Sorry I'm not being very helpful.
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] \|/ ____ \|/ ~@-/ oO \-@~ /_( \__/ )_\ \__U_/
On 9 April 2010 23:45, Mario S. Mommer <m_mommer@yahoo.com> wrote:
Faré <fahree@gmail.com> writes:
Does it work better with ASDF 1.672? If not, you might have to define some method for operation-done-p or some such.
No, unfortunately it does not work better.
And operation-done-p is returning T's and NIL's with the new asdf as well as with the one packaged with sbcl, but the latter simply does not take that as a reason to recompile the lisp files, while the former does, or recompiles them for some other reason.
Regards, Mario
_______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
_______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
-- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
participants (1)
-
Robert Goldman