[asdf-devel] testing asdf 2.28 [was: can't run quicklisp with asdf 2.28 on CCL (upgrage issue?)] [was: sbcl results for quicklisp + asdf 2.28]
Diff between unpatched quicklisp 2013-01-28 and quicklisp 2013-01-28 + asdf 2.28.6 for SBCL and CCL: http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-9.html 07.02.2013, 07:16, "Faré" <fahree@gmail.com>:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov@yandex.ru> wrote:
Meantime the SBCL results for ASDF 2.28.4
Diff comparing to 2.28: http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-7.html (don't pay attention to weblocks-test, it crushes sometimes when SBCL runs out of heap)
OK, so that's (small) progress.
Note that unicly system started to fail.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov@yandex.ru> wrote:
Diff between unpatched quicklisp 2013-01-28 and quicklisp 2013-01-28 + asdf 2.28.6 for SBCL and CCL: http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-9.html
07.02.2013, 07:16, "Faré" <fahree@gmail.com>:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov@yandex.ru> wrote:
Meantime the SBCL results for ASDF 2.28.4
Diff comparing to 2.28: http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-7.html (don't pay attention to weblocks-test, it crushes sometimes when SBCL runs out of heap)
OK, so that's (small) progress.
Note that unicly system started to fail.
It's an ASCII vs UTF-8 issue. I'm tempted for the 3.0 release to make it use UTF-8 by default instead of :default, on platforms that support it. Which means I once again have to track down the handful of offenders. —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Our love was a supernova, bursting with an immense light only to wane quickly, leaving behind a black hole.
participants (2)
-
Anton Vodonosov -
Faré