ACL 8.1 and 8.2 now fail three tests, in both modern and ANSI modes:
asdf-pathname-test.script test-module-pathnames.script test-utilities.script
It /always/ failed test-utilities (there's a launchpad bug about this --- it's not clear to me that the test is right), but it used to pass all the rest.
I think asdf-pathname-test is new, right? So maybe there's only the one regression.
More as I get a chance to look into this.
cheers, r
Yes, asdf-pathname-test is new, it's janderson's pathname test (thanks a lot, janderson).
I don't have access to ACL 8 at this point, so I can't help.
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] Luser, n.: Human-like creature that doesn't dare to use elevator, because of its belief that only horrible geeks can master arcane and obscure art of using control panel.
On 15 March 2010 22:27, Robert Goldman rpgoldman@sift.info wrote:
ACL 8.1 and 8.2 now fail three tests, in both modern and ANSI modes:
asdf-pathname-test.script test-module-pathnames.script test-utilities.script
It /always/ failed test-utilities (there's a launchpad bug about this --- it's not clear to me that the test is right), but it used to pass all the rest.
I think asdf-pathname-test is new, right? So maybe there's only the one regression.
More as I get a chance to look into this.
cheers, r
asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
-
Faré -
Robert Goldman