Luís Oliveira wrote:


I see. For our purposes, though, it seems that if CODE-CHAR returns
NIL, we should signal a test failure immediately.

I don't understand why. If code-char is allowed to return nil,
explicitly, in the CL standard, why consider that to be
a babel test failure?

Shouldn't it be possible to run the regression test under
CCL and have it succeed if babel does not have bugs?

-- Dan