Here is the patch I use to build Babel with XCVB (assuming alexandria and trivial-features are similarly patched).
Is it OK to include this patch upstream?
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] [...] there is what I call the "roundtrip fallacy": it is a mistake to use, as journalists and some economists do, statistics without logic but the reverse does not hold: It is not a mistake to use logic without statistics. -- N. C. Taleb, Fooled by Randomness, 2004.
Faré fahree@gmail.com writes:
Here is the patch I use to build Babel with XCVB (assuming alexandria and trivial-features are similarly patched).
Is it OK to include this patch upstream?
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] [...] there is what I call the "roundtrip fallacy": it is a mistake to use, as journalists and some economists do, statistics without logic but the reverse does not hold: It is not a mistake to use logic without statistics. -- N. C. Taleb, Fooled by Randomness, 2004. Index: src/enc-unicode.lisp =================================================================== --- src/enc-unicode.lisp (revision 315654) +++ src/enc-unicode.lisp (working copy) @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ ;;; This implementation is largely based on OpenMCL's l1-unicode.lisp ;;; Copyright (C) 2006 Clozure Associates and contributors.
+#+xcvb (module (:depends-on ("src/packages" "src/encodings")))
....
I don't see that the patch touched any defpackage form, so: what's the home-package of MODULE? Isn't it XCVB?
-T.
Here is the patch I use to build Babel with XCVB (assuming alexandria and trivial-features are similarly patched).
Is it OK to include this patch upstream?
Updated patch attached.
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] Is there absolutely no absolute? Isn't relativity relative?