August 2009 - bordeaux-threads-devel - mailman3.common-lisp.net

[Bordeaux-threads-devel] sbcl timeout fix
by Attila Lendvai 09 Sep '09

09 Sep '09

please find a fix attached. Tue Nov 18 20:36:34 CET 2008 attila.lendvai(a)gmail.com * fix sbcl timeout condition: export the sb-ext:timeout symbol from the bordeaux-threads package -- attila

1 1

[Bordeaux-threads-devel] No Thread Support on Darwin SBCL
by Curtis Schlak 16 Aug '09

16 Aug '09

I've just started developing in LISP, again, after some years away from it. I wanted to try using Hunchentoot which requires the Bordeaux Threads project. After asdf-installing the project, I REPLd (require :bordeaux-threads) and received the following message: WARNING: Either there is no Bordeaux-threads support for your implementation, or your implementation does not support threads therefore some features may not work. Feel free to implement it, or bug one of the maintainers to do so if your lisp supports threads at all. I'm running Mac OS X 10.5, SBCL 1.0.30, and Bordeaux-Threads 0.6.0. Does anyone know why I don't have thread support though it appears to have a "green" status on the project page? Sincerely, Curtis.

3 3

[Bordeaux-threads-devel] Basically, I suck (LW patch)
by Greg Pfeil 12 Aug '09

12 Aug '09

Matt wrote this nice patch to add condition-variables for LispWorks, and I never got it merged. I'm gone for the weekend, then switching jobs next week, then gone in Pittsburgh, then to Europe. I'm afraid if it's left to me, this will never get in. The only thing from my perspective that should change is that the unit- test-lw-conditions function should be moved into the test suite (as it should work just fine for any impl) so everyone gets the benefit. Stelian has a much better view of the state of BT these days than I do. Begin forwarded message: > From: "Matthew Lamari" <matt.lamari(a)gmail.com> > Date: 3 June 2008 11:55:42 EDT > To: "Greg Pfeil" <greg(a)technomadic.org> > Subject: Re: [Bordeaux-threads-devel] Lispworks additions to > Bordeaux - where do I submit? > > > I'm a win32 guy, so I'm not sure what you'd want the file diffed > with - please find the full file enclosed - I'm guessing the > original doesn't change very often, and that you could diff it > faster than explaining to me what to do. > > I added a simple unit-test and tried to heavily comment this, as > it's not trivial like the other call-throughs, and should probably > come under more scrutiny. > > (Unlike the non-implementation-supported literal polling) the > Lispworks' "process-wait"-based polling seems lightweight enough to > be usable in the same situations as true condition/notification, > with negligible cpu hit while waiting (see my comments if interested). > >

4 4

[Bordeaux-threads-devel] darcs problem...
by Brian O'Reilly 08 Aug '09

08 Aug '09

I originally posted this bug to clbuild-devel, reposting here at David Lichteblau's suggestion. Brian

2 2