On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 16:45 +0100, james anderson wrote:
good afternoon;
please find enclosed below a diff relative to patch 162 to improve support for mcl-5.2
Please send a unified diff(obtained with darcs diff -u)
- define acquire-lock and release-lock
- add dynamic-extent declarations for mcl and ccl
? why repeat the deftype per implementation rather than use satisfies?
Because it should lead to slightly smaller code when used in a TYPECASE.