Re: [Bordeaux-threads-devel] changes for mcl@5.2

On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 16:45 +0100, james anderson wrote:

good afternoon;

please find enclosed below a diff relative to patch 162 to improve support for mcl-5.2

Please send a unified diff(obtained with darcs diff -u)

+ define acquire-lock and release-lock * add dynamic-extent declarations for mcl and ccl ? why repeat the deftype per implementation rather than use satisfies?

Because it should lead to slightly smaller code when used in a TYPECASE. -- Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. http://common-lisp.net/project/iolib