18 Dec
2009
18 Dec
'09
4:34 p.m.
I was using WITH-TIMEOUT the other day and it seems that it doesn't quite hide the underlying implementation quite enough: on SBCL it signals an SBCL-specific condition when it times out. Thus to handle the timeout you have to either handle that specific condition or something too broad (like CONDITION). Perhaps BT:WITH-TIMEOUT should handle the underlying condition and signal a BT-defined condition so this code can be written portably. I could provide a patch for SBCL (and probably Allegro) if folks think this is a good idea. -Peter -- Peter Seibel http://www.codersatwork.com/ http://www.gigamonkeys.com/blog/