I felt obligated to disclose this email train because other programmers (possibly those on this list whom he may contact privately) should know that: 1. whatever he open-sources (before or after dec 21) may be subject to non-compete issues and patents; 2. Asking pointed questions about both non-compete and patents did not produce satisfying or complete answers, in that: 3. He appears to have danced around the non-compete issue, mentioning the agreement and its expiration date in the first email but then trying to explain why it wasn't going to be relevant to our discussion; 4. I had to find out about the patent from Google, even though it seems pretty reasonable to wonder whether a networked method for calculating newtonian physics interactions in a simulated virtual world could apply to server code for an online game, AND even though I had specifically mentioned patents as a general concern. If anything, my privately negative reaction to the non-compete agreement issue might have kept others from hearing about it later, which could be a problem, since the non-compete issue is what led me to the patent. If Mr. Morrison has violated any agreements in talking to me, that's not my problem.