The document "Revisiting CONCATENATE-SEQUENCE" by Christophe Rhodes
has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is
now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://
cdr.eurolisp.org/document/3/ for the details of this document.
Pascal
--
Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Programming Technology Lab
Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium
The document "A generic hash table interface specification for Common
Lisp" by Ingvar Mattsson has been finalized. According to the CDR
process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be
changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/2/ for the
details of this document.
Pascal
--
Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Programming Technology Lab
Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium
The document "Revisiting CONCATENATE-SEQUENCE" has been revised by
its author Christophe Rhodes. This document is still in its initial
stage and will be finalized on January 15, 2007, unless withdrawn by
the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/3/ for
more details.
Pascal
--
Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Programming Technology Lab
Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium
Hi,
The CDR mailing lists are now also available via gmane. They are
mapped as follows:
cdr-announce => gmane.lisp.cdr.announce
cdr-discuss => gmane.lisp.cdr.general
cdr-devel => gmane.lisp.cdr.devel
See http://gmane.org/ for more information
Pascal
--
Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Programming Technology Lab
Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium
Hi everyone,
I have posted the recent two announcements about prolongation of CDRs
to all three CDR-related mailing lists. We don't have the intention
to post such and similar announcements to all three lists in the
future. I have only done this because I assume that currently, people
may not be signed up to the appropriate mailing lists, especially
because cdr-discuss has only been a recent addition.
In the future, we will restrict announcements to cdr-announce
exclusively. As advertised, cdr-discuss is for discussion about
specific CDRs, and cdr-devel is for discussion about CDR itself.
There may be some overlap between cdr-discuss and cdr-devel when it
comes to the CDR document describing the CDR process, but I guess
this will pose no serious problems.
Cheers,
Pascal
--
Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Programming Technology Lab
Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium
Since the cdr-discuss mailing list is only a few days old, and on
request by the author, we have prolonged the initial period before
finalization of CDR 2 "A generic hash table interface specification
for Common Lisp" by Ingvar Mattsson until January 15, 2007. Ingvar
Mattsson welcomes discussions about this CDR at cdr-discuss to which
he is subscribed himself. Please mention CDR 2 in the subject line in
your postings about this CDR.
Pascal
--
Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Programming Technology Lab
Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium
Since the cdr-discuss mailing list is only a few days old, and on
request by the author, we have prolonged the initial period before
finalization of CDR 3 "Revisiting CONCATENATE-SEQUENCE" by Christophe
Rhodes until January 15, 2007. Christophe Rhodes welcomes discussions
about this CDR at cdr-discuss to which he is subscribed himself.
Please mention CDR 3 in the subject line in your postings about this
CDR.
Pascal
--
Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Programming Technology Lab
Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium
Hello everybody,
Based on the constructive feedback we have got on the CDR process so
far, we have made some changes to CDR as follows.
+ First, due to the fact that the CDR process has been described as
CDR 0 which has already been finalized, strictly speaking we aren't
allowed to make changes to CDR anymore. We have solved this by
resubmitting the CDR process itself as CDR 4. You can find the new
version at http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/4/ together with the
changes compared to CDR 0 (which are also described below).
Since we expect more suggestions for improvement in the near future,
we use an exceptionally long initial period for CDR 4 until November
1, 2007. This allows us to make changes as we go along. At the same
time, the CDR process in use will already be CDR 4. This means that
the CDR process for submitted CDRs until then will be somewhat
unstable, but we think that this gives us the advantage of being able
to experiment a little such that the final result will hopefully be a
better tested process.
Consider this equivalent to the bootstrapping of a metacircular
software architecture, or to the development of any new piece of
software for that matter, where you have to test and change things as
you go as well. ;)
+ We have added more details about submission of accompanying
material, especially with regard to licenses that give us the right
to publish it at the CDR website and related publications. We forgot
about this issue in CDR 0.
+ We have added a section where we ask authors and submitters to
provide rationales for changes they have made during the initial
period. From now on, we also intend to add archives of previous
versions of a CDR for better traceability of such changes.
+ We have added a mailing list cdr-discuss - see http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-discuss for the mailing list
page. This mailing list is supposed to be used for discussions about
specific CDRs. This is especially useful when CDRs are in their
initial period, but may also be useful afterwards. The already
existing cdr-devel is purely for discussions about issues related to
CDR itself (that go beyond the scope of what is described in CDR 0
and CDR 4).
We hope that these changes address the suggestions we have got so far.
Best,
Pascal
--
Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Programming Technology Lab
Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium
Ingvar Mattsson has submitted a new version of CDR 2 which is now
available at http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/2/
Cheers,
Pascal
--
Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Programming Technology Lab
Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium
The document "Revisiting CONCATENATE-SEQUENCE" has been submitted by
Christophe Rhodes and has been accepted as CDR document 3. According
to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and
will be finalized on December 13, 2006, unless withdrawn by the
author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/3/ for the
details of this document.
Pascal
--
Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Programming Technology Lab
Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium
The document "A generic hash table interface specification for Common
Lisp" has been submitted by Ingvar Mattsson and has been accepted as
CDR document 2. According to the CDR process, this document is now in
its initial stage and will be finalized on November 29, 2006, unless
withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/
document/2/ for the details of this document.
Pascal
--
Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Programming Technology Lab
Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium
According to the CDR Process, the CDR documents 0 and 1 have been
finalized today.
See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/final.html for more information.
Furthermore, we have set up a CDR Blog at http://cdr-blog.blogspot.com/ where we will post the same announcements as in
this mailing list.
Cheers,
Pascal
--
Pascal Costanza, mailto:pc@p-cos.net, http://p-cos.net
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Programming Technology Lab
Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium