Thanks for the prompt reply.

20.04.2019, 16:17, Antoniotti Marco <antoniotti.marco@disco.unimib.it>
Hi

the CDR situation is as you see it.

Indeed; I hope for a partial revival (and in any case unambiguous identifiers are useful)

1. I agree that the links for the mailing lists could go to the Mailman pages.

Does it make sense for me to submit a patch, and if yes — against what?

Is the static HTML the true source?

2. It has been a while, but why not?

OK, thanks.

I am not sure what you mean with your last question.

Well, CDR4 defines that the initial mutable-proposal period is 6 weeks, but a longer period could be negotiated; from my experience with discussions in other communities, I would want to freeze the document based on the discussion beginning and then running out of changes to discuss (or out of arguments for/against some change), not by some time limit precisely agreed upon in advance.

> 1. I think the links should go to
> https://mailman.common-lisp.net/listinfo/cdr-announce
> https://mailman.common-lisp.net/listinfo/cdr-devel
> https://mailman.common-lisp.net/listinfo/cdr-discuss
>
> I guess I also have a process-related question: do I understand
> correctly that negotiating a longer (maximum) initial period is
> compatible with declaring a condition for ending it before the
> negotiated maximum (but after 6 weeks after initial proposal)?