sorry, replied directly instead to the group. forwarding to the ml.
On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 14:04 +0200, Daniel Kochmański wrote:
> > This has been discussed before and it was not quite deemed a very
> > useful approach, as it would mean that you would have single
> > namespace where different implementations of a given CDR would be
> > dumped, possibly causing unwanted misalignments.
>
> If something may be implemented as a library (i.e doesn't require
> special interfaces provided by the implementation) it might be
> arguable
> if it is a useful as a "standard extension" instead of a "library
> with
> documented protocol".
