- Pascal Costanza cp-99BKOWH6pVcrbJU0hmoH5j@choyvp.tznar.bet [2012-05-19 19:05:00 +0200]:
It seems to me that :cdr-nnn for *features* is straightforward and no objections were ever raised, as far as I can tell.
*features* is already often so long, it is hard to navigate. I know it is a lame objection, and it is quite possible that :cdr-nnn is the way to go, but I am still wary about mandating too many *features* elements. Imagine there are hundreds of CDR's, some might well be very complicated, so that for a cleanup of the pathname system, e.g., we will have something like #+(or cdr-33 cdr-33-12 cdr-33-12-7) to check for a feature specified in the section 12.7 of the CDR 33. :-)