18 Mar
2008
18 Mar
'08
2:21 p.m.
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:50:28 +0100, Pascal Costanza pc@p-cos.net wrote:
BTW, even if we are talking about a new my-case, it may be a good idea to remain backwards compatible to ease 'refactoring' between cl:case and my-case. It would be an unnecessary source of bugs if you had to add or remove parentheses in the first argument when you want to go from one operator to the other. These are things that are easily forgotten, especially if something looks otherwise innocuous.
Hmm, yes, I tend to agree with this.