[cdr-discuss] Re: [RfC] WITH-READTABLE-ITERATOR

Thanks for the corrections! Ariel Badichi writes:

...

MACRO-CHAR-TYPES. If MACRO-CHAR-TYPES is null, both `:macro-char' and

I take it you meant "nil" (or better yet, "the empty list") rather than "null".

I used "If M-C-T are not supplied, ...".

...

An error of type `type-error' is signalled if READTABLE does not

The CLHS uses the alternative spelling, "signaled". Why is this passage in the passive, while the previous one was in the active?

No particular reason. -T.