
18 Mar
2008
18 Mar
'08
3:17 p.m.
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:34:40 +0100 (CET), "Leslie P. Polzer" <leslie.polzer@gmx.net> wrote:
Is a conforming implementation required to signal an error when an argument not defined by the standard occurs in the lambda list of a function?
I'm not a language lawyer, but I'd be /very/ surprised if it where in the spirit of the ANSI spec that you could "extend" functions at your whim. As a data point, look at the dictionary entry for DIRECTORY which specifically allows implementations to add keyword parameters to the function. Why would that passage be in there?