On Apr 26, 2019, at 14:12 , Daniel Kochmański <daniel@turtleware.eu> wrote:
sorry, replied directly instead to the group. forwarding to the ml.
On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 14:04 +0200, Daniel Kochmański wrote:
This has been discussed before and it was not quite deemed a very useful approach, as it would mean that you would have single namespace where different implementations of a given CDR would be dumped, possibly causing unwanted misalignments.
If something may be implemented as a library (i.e doesn't require special interfaces provided by the implementation) it might be arguable if it is a useful as a "standard extension" instead of a "library with documented protocol".
True, but I don’t think CDR should forbid the submission of what could be “a library”. Cheers -- Marco Antoniotti