cells-devel June 2008

cells-devel@common-lisp.net

9 participants
13 discussions

Fwd: [cells-devel] Where is each project?
by Andy Chambers 11 Jun '08

11 Jun '08

>> P.S. It would be real nice to have a canonical git repository for each >> on github or gitorious. > > I know CVS is quite old and people use darcs, git, svn, and mercurial > these days, but what advantage is it exactly that we would get from > migrating to git? There is a repo for celtk on gitorious. It includes an extra "expander" widget that I created and leaves out some of the allegro specific stuff that's in vanilla celtk. I've never really worked seriously with any other VCS but here's some of the things I like about Git. 1. encourages frequent commits (since commits can be done locally) 2. easy to create branches (and easier to merge them) 3. a nice interface to the history of your project (gitk) 4. a really nice emacs-mode (M-x git-status, M-x git-annotate) 5. easy creation of tarballs (git archive HEAD >project.gz) It interoperates nicely with cvs so there's no problem with setting up a repo on gitorious whose master branch simply mirrors the cvs repo. I think I sent a message to the list a while back that shows the steps I took to do this for celtk. -- Andy -- ---- Andy Chambers Formedix Ltd

1 0

[cells-devel] How to get free quality visitors to your website?
by Targeted＠common-lisp.net 09 Jun '08

09 Jun '08

No Matter what you are selling - Hit-Booster will send targeted visitors to your website! Within 15 minutes you will have your own website traffic generator that will bring in an ever increasing amount of hits to your websites! Automatically This software is perfect for bringing real traffic to your site... even if... it's an affiliate link where you have no control over the website content! For Full Details please read the attached .html file Unsubscribe: on attached html file click on contact form

1 0

[cells-devel] Re: [cells-gtk-devel] cells-gtk3 without libcellsgtk
by Ingo Bormuth 02 Jun '08

02 Jun '08

Hi Peter, sorry for that late reply. Due to a misbehaving progmailrc your last mail was sorted into the cells-devel folder where I didn't read it. Please find the following patched attached: 0001-Remove-clisp-hack.patch Complete removes the clisp-call-next-method hack as I think it's no longer needed at all. See below. 0002-In-cells3-def-c-output-was-renamed-to-defobserver.patch Renames remaining occurrences of 'def-c-output'. I wonder why there weren't any errors as the macro was removed from cells3. 0003-Inactivate-optional-stuff-by-default.patch Inactivate optional features (threads, cairo, opengl and libcellsgtk) by default. I think it's more convenient to activate those when needed instead of patching the .asd files all the time. Test-gtk.asd still does exactly this. > > 2. Also if used in a single threading environment (like clisp) > > (g-thread-init...) and (gdk-threads-init) do get called which > > results in an error. > > Hmm, I never changed that, I think. They were always called in > cells-gtk if IIRC. However, if it does no harm to leave them out, > then that seems the right thing to do. > > Are you on windows or linux? I'm just guessing, but it might be the > case that it is a GTK issue and not a cells-gtk issue whether to call > them: On linux GTK supports threads, so it might be necessary to call > those (even if you don't use threads yourself). On windows it > doesn't, so maybe you can't call them. In this case, we should > condition on :unix vs. :windows. But again, I'm just guessing. If > you're on linux, then forget everything I said. I'm primarily on sbcl/linux. Recently I started to maintain the project for clisp/windows. As far as I remember thought, I realized the described problem have way down on clisp/linux. > As to the call-next-method thing, the background is this: > > [...] > > I'd suggest you just go ahead and deactivate all > those calls (e.g by conditioning on :no-progn-combination instead of > :clisp), which should remove those warnings. As mentioned above I decided against ':no-progn-combination'. In my opinion the call-next-method hack is of little use since '(:method-combination progn)' was removed for clisp in 'cells.lisp'. Please tell me in case I'm wrong here so I can change the patch. Thanks again (everybody) Ingo _______________________________________________________________ Schon gehört? Der neue WEB.DE MultiMessenger kann`s mit allen: http://www.produkte.web.de/messenger/?did=3016

2 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

cells-devel June 2008