On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Ken Tilton kennytilton@optonline.net wrote:
Peter Hildebrandt wrote:
Sounds good. I wasn't sure as to whether I understood what I was doing. I just saw that not-to-be did not propagate to kids *at all* if I did it the way I suggested.
OK.
That was with test-gtk -- my favorite test case.
I hacked up not-to-be a little (tho nothing fundamentally different than what I recall of your efforts which I cannot find in my email), moved cells-store out into its own source file (update your asd!), reran the cells regression test and test-gtk -- everything works.
Hmmm -- I don't see the new source file anywhere. What's its name? Did you add it to CVS before you did the commit?
Btw, I've updated the cells-gtk3 stuff every now and then -- did you update from CVS recently? I added a bunch of trcs to see what gets quiesced when.
Mind you there may not be a non-.kids owning test anywhere in there, or even anything that verifies that the .kids are getting quiesced, but your report above of "I just saw that not-to-be did not propagate to kids *at all*" does not say /how/ you saw that, so maybe there is still non-propagation which is not being exposed by the test suite and still needs to be cured.
I'd like to provide test cases. Where would be a good place to put them? Then I'd seize the opportunity and merge in my with-assert-observers macrology somewhere :) That would also prove useful to check what gets not-to-be'd.
Thanks, Peter