14 Apr
2008
14 Apr
'08
5:12 p.m.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Ken Tilton <kennytilton@optonline.net> wrote:
btw, note that this undetected re-entrance would happen if /any/ rule in the chain leading back to the same cell did a without-c-dependency.
If you write it like that, it's pretty clear given the scope. But for real world code, this must have been a pretty big loop hole -- allowing for dangerous code to pass through and break badly further down the road. So I'm glad we're on the safe side now. :-) Peter